Reasoning from Classification and Definition

Argumentation, Vol. 23, pp. 81-107, 2009

25 Pages Posted: 21 Jan 2011

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the uses and misuses of argumentation schemes from verbal classification, and show how argument from definition supports argumentation based on argument from verbal classification. The inquiry has inevitably included the broader study of the concept of definition. The paper presents the schemes for argument from classification and for argument from definition, and shows how the latter type of argument so typically supports the former. The problem of analyzing arguments based on classification is framed in a structure that reveals the crucial role it plays in the persuasion process. The survey of the literature includes the work of Hastings, Perelman, Kienpointner and Schiappa, but still finds much of value in Aristotle. Lessons drawn from Aristotle’s Topics are shown to be useful for developing new tools for assessing definitions and arguments from definition.

Keywords: Definition, Classification, Argumentation, Argumentation Schemes

Suggested Citation

Macagno, Fabrizio, Reasoning from Classification and Definition (2009). Argumentation, Vol. 23, pp. 81-107, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1743658

Fabrizio Macagno (Contact Author)

Universidade Nova de Lisboa ( email )

Av. Berna 26 I&D Building, office 4.02
Lisbon, 1069-061
Portugal

HOME PAGE: http://fabriziomacagno.altervista.org/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
118
Abstract Views
1,092
Rank
424,928
PlumX Metrics