Managing Environmental, Health, and Safety Risks: A Comparative Assessment of the Minerals Management Service and Other Agencies
Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 10-64
113 Pages Posted: 27 Jan 2011
Date Written: January 12, 2011
Abstract
This study compares and contrasts regulatory and related practices - in particular, regulatory decisionmaking, risk assessment and planning processes, inspection and compliance, and organization structure, budgets, and training - of the Minerals Management Service (MMS, now the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement, or BOEMRE) with those of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Comparing MMS practices with those of other federal agencies that also manage low-probability but high-consequence environmental risks provides a basis for identifying opportunities for enhancing regulatory capacity and safety performance in managing deepwater energy exploration and production. Our research finds important differences in processes for setting standards; peer review contribution to the rulemaking process; establishment of tolerable risk thresholds; and training of key staff. The paper concludes with several recommendations for how various EPA and FAA practices might be modified and used at BOEMRE to strengthen its regulatory and risk management processes.
Keywords: Minerals Management Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Management
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Deepwater Drilling: Law, Policy, and Economics of Firm Organization and Safety
By Mark A. Cohen, Madeline Gottlieb, ...
-
Preliminary Empirical Assessment of Offshore Production Platforms in the Gulf of Mexico
By Lucija Muehlenbachs, Mark A. Cohen, ...
-
Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Deepwater Oil Drilling Regulation
By Alan Krupnick, Sarah E. Campbell, ...