The Politics of Government Financial Management: Evidence from State Bonds
66 Pages Posted: 24 Jan 2011 Last revised: 22 Jul 2017
There are 2 versions of this paper
The Politics of Government Financial Management: Evidence from State Bonds
Date Written: July 16, 2017
Abstract
In the $3.7 trillion U.S. state-and-local-government-bond market, greater issuance costs (lower issue-prices and greater underwriting fees) benefit financial institutions, while costing taxpayers. Campaign contributions by politically supportive underwriters can be associated with lower issuance costs. Alternatively, contributions can influence a politician to accept greater costs. This paper’s evidence suggests that contributions influence politicians: In the absence of an underwriter auction, underpricing increases with the chosen underwriter’s contributions relative to others. Moreover, the difference in the fees charged by contributing underwriters and those charged by non-contributing underwriters is 2.9%. In the presence of an underwriter auction, these results are statistically insignificant.
Keywords: Government Financial Management, Securities Issuance, Underpricing, Campaign Contributions.
JEL Classification: H74, P16, G24
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Uncertainty about Government Policy and Stock Prices
By Lubos Pastor and Pietro Veronesi
-
Uncertainty About Government Policy and Stock Prices
By Lubos Pastor and Pietro Veronesi
-
Uncertainty About Government Policy and Stock Prices
By Lubos Pastor and Pietro Veronesi
-
Uncertainty About Government Policy and Stock Prices
By Lubos Pastor and Pietro Veronesi
-
Investment with Uncertain Tax Policy: Does Random Tax Policy Discourage Investment?
-
Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty
By Scott R. Baker, Nicholas Bloom, ...
-
Political Uncertainty and Corporate Investment Cycles
By Brandon Julio and Youngsuk Yook