Austin's Ghost and DSU Reform
International Lawyer, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 651-676, 2003
26 Pages Posted: 23 Apr 2011
Date Written: 2003
Abstract
Members of the World Trade Organization face numerous issues relating to the reform of the dispute settlement mechanism. At bottom, all of the issues present a challenge: Are the Members serious about advancing the rule of law in international trade? That is, what kind of "legal" system do they want to govern cross-border trade? This challenge presumes a definition of what "law" is. Among many scholars through the ages, the nineteenth century English legal philosopher, John Austin, considered the definition. His three-part test defined "law" as (1) the issuance of a command by a central authority, (2) the reinforcement of that command by threat of punishment, and (3) the habitual obedience to commands of the authority, and is useful in classifying the WTO dispute settlement reform issues. Rather than merely listing a complex array, the issues can be put into one of three categories inspired by Austin's famed Command Theory of Law. That exercise underscores the enormity of the challenge now facing the WTO.
Keywords: international trade, WTO, World Trade Organization
JEL Classification: K33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Complainants, Interested Parties and Free Riders
By Chad P. Bown
-
The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape
-
GATT, Dispute Settlement and Cooperation
By Marie C. Thursby and Dan Kovenock
-
The Case for Auctioning Countermeasures in the WTO
By Kyle Bagwell, Petros C. Mavroidis, ...
-
The Case for Tradable Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement
By Kyle Bagwell, Petros C. Mavroidis, ...
-
Power Plays and Capacity Constraints: The Selection of Defendants in WTO Disputes
By Andrew T. Guzman and Beth A. Simmons
-
Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement
By Kym Anderson