Part-Time Work and Employer-Provided Training: Boon to Women and Bane to Men?
Swiss Leading House Working Paper No. 58
27 Pages Posted: 13 Apr 2011
Date Written: March 2011
Abstract
Previous studies on employer-provided training have consistently shown a gap in training participation between part-time and full-time workers. This study examines whether the training disadvantage for part-time workers differs by gender. To capture the uncertainty in the firm's training decision and to factor in heterogeneity among part-time workers, our analysis draws not only on human capital but also on statistical discrimination theory.
Our empirical results indicate that gender plays a role in determining part-time/full-time training differences. Whereas for women working part-time or full-time makes only a minor difference, for men working part-time constitutes a serious disadvantage in access to employer-provided training. The results remain consistent among different subsamples.
Keywords: part-time work, training probability
JEL Classification: I21, J16, M53
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Part-Time Pay Penalty for Women in Britain
By Alan Manning and Barbara Petrongolo
-
The Part-Time Pay Penalty for Women in Britain
By Alan Manning and Barbara Petrongolo
-
Why Do Part-Time Workers Earn Less? The Role of Worker and Job Skills
-
Moving Down: Women's Part - Time Work and Occupational Change in Britain 1991-2001
By Sara Connolly and Mary Gregory
-
Back-to-Front Down-Under? Part-Time/Full-Time Wage Differentials in Australia
By Alison L. Booth and Margi Wood
-
Job Satisfaction and Family Happiness: The Part-Time Work Puzzle
By Alison L. Booth and Jan C. Van Ours