Lessons Learned: Advantages and Disadvantages of Mixed Methods Research
Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, Forthcoming
26 Pages Posted: 2 May 2011 Last revised: 9 May 2011
Date Written: December 13, 2010
Abstract
The purposes of this paper are to (1) discuss the theoretical assumptions, qualities, problems and myopia of the dominating quantitative and qualitative approaches, (2) describe the methodological lessons that we learned while conducting a series of longitudinal studies on the use and usefulness of a specialized balanced scorecard, and (3) encourage researchers to actually use multiple methods and sources of data to address the very many accounting phenomena that we still do not understand well.
Design/methodology/approach - This paper is an opinion piece based on our experience conducting a series of longitudinal mixed method studies.
Findings - We suggest that the divides between quantitative vs. qualitative methods and economic vs. more behavioral theories are not constructive toward understanding accounting phenomena.
Originality/value - We hope this paper provides encouragement to those that may wish to bridge our ideological gaps and comfort to those that are actively trying to do so.
Keywords: Qualitative Research, Quantitative Research, Mixed Method Research, Research Methods
JEL Classification: M41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Conjectures Regarding Empirical Managerial Accounting Research
-
In Search of Management Accounting Theory
By Teemu Malmi and Markus Granlund
-
Innovation in Management Accounting: The Needs of World-Class Firms
By Shokrollah Khajavi and Amin Nazemi