Giving to Secular Causes by the Religious and Nonreligious: An Experimental Test of the Responsiveness of Giving to Subsidies

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 271-289, June 2004

20 Pages Posted: 16 May 2011

See all articles by Catherine C. Eckel

Catherine C. Eckel

Texas A&M University

Philip J. Grossman

Monash University - Department of Economics

Date Written: June 1, 2004

Abstract

Although evidence indicates that religious persons are more generous on average than nonreligious persons, little work has been done to determine if this greater generosity is a general pattern or is, rather, specific to church-based institutions. Limited research addresses if, or how, religious and nonreligious givers respond to subsidies. This article uses experimental data to examine differences in the amount and pattern of giving to secular charities in response to subsidies by self-identified religious and nonreligious participants. The results indicate no significant difference in either the amount or pattern of giving or in the response to subsidies by religious and nonreligious participants; however, giving by religious participants is significantly more responsive to income changes than giving by nonreligious participants.

Keywords: charitable giving, religion, experiment, subsidies

Suggested Citation

Eckel, Catherine C. and Grossman, Philip J., Giving to Secular Causes by the Religious and Nonreligious: An Experimental Test of the Responsiveness of Giving to Subsidies (June 1, 2004). Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 271-289, June 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1843490

Catherine C. Eckel (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University ( email )

5201 University Blvd.
College Station, TX 77843-4228
United States

Philip J. Grossman

Monash University - Department of Economics ( email )

Wellington Road
Clayton, 3800
Australia
61399020052 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
40
Abstract Views
540
PlumX Metrics