Instrumental Variable Estimation with Heteroskedasticity and Many Instruments

46 Pages Posted: 15 Jul 2013

See all articles by Jerry A. Hausman

Jerry A. Hausman

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Whitney K. Newey

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Tiemen Woutersen

University of Arizona

John C. Chao

University of Maryland

Norman R. Swanson

Rutgers University - Department of Economics; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Department of Economics

Date Written: September 1, 2009

Abstract

This paper gives a relatively simple, well behaved solution to the problem of many instruments in heteroskedastic data. Such settings are common in microeconometric applications where many instruments are used to improve efficiency and allowance for heteroskedasticity is generally important. The solution is a Fuller (1977) like estimator and standard errors that are robust to heteroskedasticity and many instruments. We show that the estimator has finite moments and high asymptotic efficiency in a range of cases. The standard errors are easy to compute, being like White’s (1982), with additional terms that account for many instruments. They are consistent under standard, many instrument, and many weak instrument asymptotics. Based on a series of Monte Carlo experiments, we find that the estimators perform as well as LIML or Fuller (1977) under homoskedasticity, and have much lower bias and dispersion under heteroskedasticity, in nearly all cases considered.

Keywords: Instrumental Variables, Jackknife, Many Instruments, Heteroskedasticity

JEL Classification: C12, C13, C23

Suggested Citation

Hausman, Jerry A. and Newey, Whitney K. and Woutersen, Tiemen and Chao, John C. and Swanson, Norman Rasmus and Swanson, Norman Rasmus, Instrumental Variable Estimation with Heteroskedasticity and Many Instruments (September 1, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1856067 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1856067

Jerry A. Hausman

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics ( email )

50 Memorial Drive
Room E52-271a
Cambridge, MA 02142
United States
617-253-3644 (Phone)
617-253-1330 (Fax)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Whitney K. Newey (Contact Author)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics ( email )

50 Memorial Drive
E52-262D
Cambridge, MA 02142
United States
617-253-6420 (Phone)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Tiemen Woutersen

University of Arizona ( email )

Department of Economics
Tucson, AZ 85721
United States

John C. Chao

University of Maryland ( email )

Department of Economics
College Park, MD 20742
United States
301-405-1579 (Phone)
301-408-3542 (Fax)

Norman Rasmus Swanson

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Department of Economics ( email )

75 Hamilton Street
New Brunswick, NJ 08901
United States
848-932-7432 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://econweb.rutgers.edu/nswanson/

Rutgers University - Department of Economics ( email )

NJ
United States

HOME PAGE: http://econweb.rutgers.edu/nswanson/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
59
Abstract Views
810
Rank
653,277
PlumX Metrics