Better-Reply Dynamics in Deferred Acceptance Games
27 Pages Posted: 3 Jun 2011
Date Written: June 1, 2011
Abstract
In this paper we address the question of learning in a two-sided matching mechanism that utilizes the deferred acceptance algorithm. We consider a repeated matching game where at each period agents observe their match and have the opportunity to revise their strategy (i.e., the preference list they will submit to the mechanism). We focus in this paper on better-reply dynamics. To this end, we first provide a characterization of better-replies and a comprehensive description of the dominance relation between strategies. Better-replies are shown to have a simple structure and can be decomposed into four types of changes. We then present a simple better-reply dynamics with myopic and boundedly rational agents and identify conditions that ensure that limit outcomes are outcome equivalent to the outcome obtained when agents play their dominant strategies. Better-reply dynamics may not converge, but if they do converge, then the limit strategy profiles constitute a subset of the Nash equilibria of the stage game.
Keywords: better-reply dynamics, deferred acceptance, two-sided matching.
JEL Classification: C72, D41.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Atila Abdulkadiroglu, Parag A. Pathak, ...
-
Preference Signaling in Matching Markets
By Peter A. Coles, Alexey Kushnir, ...
-
The Effects of a Centralized Clearinghouse on Job Placement, Wages, and Hiring Practices
By Muriel Niederle and Alvin E. Roth
-
By Sebastian Braun, Nadja Dwenger, ...
-
Interviewing in Two-Sided Matching Markets
By Robin S. Lee and Michael Schwarz
-
Decentralized Matching with Aligned Preferences
By Muriel Niederle and Leeat Yariv
-
Interviews and Adverse Selection
By Jens Josephson and Joel D. Shapiro