What are Barrier Islands Worth? Estimates of Willingness to Pay for Restoration

Marine Resource Economics, Vol. 24, p. 131-146, 2009

17 Pages Posted: 20 Jul 2011

See all articles by Daniel R. Petrolia

Daniel R. Petrolia

Mississippi State University - Department of Agricultural Economics

Tae-Goun Kim

Independent

Date Written: June 16, 2008

Abstract

A dichotomous-choice contingent-valuation survey was conducted in the State of Mississippi (USA) to estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for three restoration options being considered for the state’s barrier islands. Random-effects probit models were estimated, and parametric and non-parametric WTP estimates and confidence intervals were calculated. Turnbull lower-bound mean WTP was $22 per respondent to maintain the existing footprint over a 30-year period, $152 to restore 2,338 acres (pre-1969 footprint), and $277 to restore 5,969 acres (pre-1900 footprint).Econometric results indicate that for the Pre-Camille and Pre-1900 options, coastal residents and those citing storm protection, recreation impact, and environmental impact as primary decision factors, were more likely to support restoration, with marginal effects of these greater for the Pre-Camille option. For the Status-Quo option, 75% of respondents voted in favor of restoration, and the offered bid was not significant; only the hurricane-protection and environmental-impact variables were significant for this option.

Keywords: contingent valuation, Krinsky-Robb, random effects, Turnbull

JEL Classification: H41, Q24, Q26, Q51, Q57

Suggested Citation

Petrolia, Daniel R. and Kim, Tae-Goun, What are Barrier Islands Worth? Estimates of Willingness to Pay for Restoration (June 16, 2008). Marine Resource Economics, Vol. 24, p. 131-146, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1889277

Daniel R. Petrolia (Contact Author)

Mississippi State University - Department of Agricultural Economics ( email )

Box 5187
Mississippi State, MS 39762
United States

Tae-Goun Kim

Independent ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
81
Abstract Views
684
Rank
545,002
PlumX Metrics