Securing Sovereign State Standing

52 Pages Posted: 30 Aug 2011 Last revised: 6 Jan 2025

Date Written: November 01, 2011

Abstract

There are three main categories of interests upon which states can premise standing to sue as plaintiffs in federal court - proprietary, sovereign, and quasi-sovereign interests. Proprietary and sovereign interests, this Note contends, are held independently by states qua states, whereas quasi-sovereign interests are derivative of citizens’ collective welfare interests. This Note attempts to correct the pervasive confusion clouding the boundary between sovereign and quasi-sovereign interests, arguing that they are meaningfully distinct and should be treated differently.

This argument is especially important in the context of the jurisdictional bar instituted by the Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. Mellon, which prohibits states from pursuing 'parens patriae' suits to shield their citizens from federal law. Parens patriae is a special type of representative standing through which states can vindicate generalized citizen interests. This Note argues that states act as parens patriae in the relevant context when they assert quasi-sovereign standing only - and thus not when they seek to defend their sovereign interests. The Mellon bar, therefore, should disallow only certain quasi-sovereign suits; it should be wholly inapplicable to sovereignty-vindicating claims.

Finally, a look at Virginia’s current attack on the constitutionality of recent federal healthcare reform, Virginia ex rel. Cuccinelli v. Sebelius, sharpens and contextualizes these issues. Virginia has asserted purely sovereign interests, but the federal government defendant has argued that the Mellon bar should nevertheless apply.

This discussion is both timely, given the immediacy and prominence of the standing issues underlying the Virginia healthcare challenge, and significant, given its importance for fundamental and enduring issues of American federalism.

Keywords: state standing, sovereign state standing, state sovereignty, sovereign interests, parens patriae, Massachusetts v. Mellon, Virginia ex rel. Cuccinelli v. Sebelius, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, PPACA, Affordable Care Act, ACA

undefined

Suggested Citation

Crocker, Katherine Mims, Securing Sovereign State Standing (November 01, 2011). 97 Virginia Law Review 2051 (2011), Virginia Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 8, 2011, pp. 2051-101, Texas A&M University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1919353

Katherine Mims Crocker (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University School of Law ( email )

1515 Commerce St.
Fort Worth, TX Tarrant County 76102
United States

0 References

    0 Citations

      Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

      Paper statistics

      Downloads
      217
      Abstract Views
      1,518
      Rank
      295,228
      PlumX Metrics
      Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
      • Usage
        • Abstract Views: 1514
        • Downloads: 217
      • Captures
        • Readers: 2
      see details