Selection Models in Accounting Research

The Accounting Review, Forthcoming

Posted: 5 Nov 2011

See all articles by Clive S. Lennox

Clive S. Lennox

University of Southern California

Jere R. Francis

Maastricht University

Zi-Tian Wang

Southwestern University of Finance and Economics

Date Written: November 3, 2011

Abstract

This study explains the challenges associated with the Heckman (1979) procedure to control for selection bias, assesses the quality of its application in accounting research, and offers guidance for better implementation of selection models. A survey of 75 recent accounting articles in leading journals reveals that many researchers implement the technique in a mechanical way with relatively little appreciation of important econometric issues and problems surrounding its use. Using empirical examples motivated by prior research, we illustrate that selection models are fragile and can yield quite literally any possible outcome in response to fairly minor changes in model specification. We conclude with guidance on how researchers can better implement selection models that will provide more convincing evidence on potential selection bias, including the need to justify model specifications and careful sensitivity analyses with respect to robustness and multicollinearity.

Keywords: selection model, Heckman, selection bias, endogeneity, treatment effect model

JEL Classification: C10, M40

Suggested Citation

Lennox, Clive and Francis, Jere R. and Wang, Zi-Tian, Selection Models in Accounting Research (November 3, 2011). The Accounting Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1954252

Clive Lennox (Contact Author)

University of Southern California ( email )

2250 Alcazar Street
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Jere R. Francis

Maastricht University ( email )

P.O. Box 616
Maastricht, 6200 MD
Netherlands

Zi-Tian Wang

Southwestern University of Finance and Economics ( email )

Chengdu, Sichuan
China

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
3,300
PlumX Metrics