Accounting Fraud: An Estimation of Detection Probability

37 Pages Posted: 5 Nov 2011 Last revised: 16 Nov 2011

See all articles by Artur Filipe Ewald Wuerges

Artur Filipe Ewald Wuerges

Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Jose Alonso Borba

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) - Accounting Department

Date Written: November 4, 2011

Abstract

Financial statement fraud (FSF) is costly for investors and can damage the credibility of the audit profession. To prevent and detect fraud, it is helpful to know its causes. The binary choice models (e.g. logit and probit) commonly used in the extant literature, however, fail to account for undetected cases of fraud and thus present unreliable hypotheses tests. Using a sample of 118 companies accused of fraud by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we estimated a logit model that corrects the problems arising from undetected frauds in U.S. companies. Our results indicate that only 1.43 percent of the instances of FSF were publicized by the SEC. Of the seven significant variables included in the traditional, uncorrected logit model, three were found to be actually non-significant in the corrected model. The likelihood of FSF is 5.12 times higher when the firm’s auditor does not issue an unqualified (clean) report.

Keywords: Accounting fraud, AAER, Misclassification, Logit, Factor Analysis

Suggested Citation

Wuerges, Artur Filipe Ewald and Borba, Jose Alonso, Accounting Fraud: An Estimation of Detection Probability (November 4, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1954783 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954783

Artur Filipe Ewald Wuerges (Contact Author)

Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) ( email )

Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima
Bairro Trindade
Florianopolis, Santa Catarina 88040
Brazil

Jose Alonso Borba

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) - Accounting Department ( email )

Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima
Bairro Trindade
Florianopolis, Santa Catarina 88040
Brazil

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
736
Abstract Views
4,156
Rank
63,979
PlumX Metrics