Accounting Fraud: An Estimation of Detection Probability
37 Pages Posted: 5 Nov 2011 Last revised: 16 Nov 2011
Date Written: November 4, 2011
Abstract
Financial statement fraud (FSF) is costly for investors and can damage the credibility of the audit profession. To prevent and detect fraud, it is helpful to know its causes. The binary choice models (e.g. logit and probit) commonly used in the extant literature, however, fail to account for undetected cases of fraud and thus present unreliable hypotheses tests. Using a sample of 118 companies accused of fraud by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we estimated a logit model that corrects the problems arising from undetected frauds in U.S. companies. Our results indicate that only 1.43 percent of the instances of FSF were publicized by the SEC. Of the seven significant variables included in the traditional, uncorrected logit model, three were found to be actually non-significant in the corrected model. The likelihood of FSF is 5.12 times higher when the firm’s auditor does not issue an unqualified (clean) report.
Keywords: Accounting fraud, AAER, Misclassification, Logit, Factor Analysis
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud?
By I. J. Alexander Dyck, Adair Morse, ...
-
Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud?
By I. J. Alexander Dyck, Adair Morse, ...
-
Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud?
By I. J. Alexander Dyck, Adair Morse, ...
-
Analyst Coverage and Earnings Management
By Frank Yu
-
By Krishna Palepu and Paul M. Healy
-
By Marilyn F. Johnson, Karen K. Nelson, ...
-
Do the Merits Matter Less after the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act?
-
Governance and Intermediation Problems in Capital Markets: Evidence from the Fall of Enron
By Paul M. Healy and Krishna Palepu
-
The Screening Effect of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
By Stephen J. Choi, Karen K. Nelson, ...