Why the Case for Amending the U.S. Constitution to Prohibit or Regulate Gay Marriage is 'Not Proved'

9 Pages Posted: 6 Nov 2011

See all articles by Vikram D. Amar

Vikram D. Amar

University of California, Davis - School of Law; University of Illinois College of Law

Alan E. Brownstein

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Date Written: 2005

Abstract

Conservatives and moderate Republicans (and more than a few Democrats) are waiting to see how vigorously President Bush will campaign, during his second term, for his proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution to prohibit recognition of any State of same-sex marriages. In his January 2005 State of the Union message, the President reaffirmed his support for the idea, but did not give a sense of how hard he will push.

In this short essay, we make some general observations on when amending the Federal Constitution is a wise thing to consider, and apply those observations to the question of gay marriage.

Suggested Citation

Amar, Vikram D. and Brownstein, Alan Edward, Why the Case for Amending the U.S. Constitution to Prohibit or Regulate Gay Marriage is 'Not Proved' (2005). Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 1 and 2, Fall 2004, Winter 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1954910

Vikram D. Amar (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201
United States

University of Illinois College of Law

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

Alan Edward Brownstein

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201
United States
530-752-2586 (Phone)
530-752-4704 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
36
Abstract Views
423
PlumX Metrics