Why the Case for Amending the U.S. Constitution to Prohibit or Regulate Gay Marriage is 'Not Proved'
9 Pages Posted: 6 Nov 2011
Date Written: 2005
Abstract
Conservatives and moderate Republicans (and more than a few Democrats) are waiting to see how vigorously President Bush will campaign, during his second term, for his proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution to prohibit recognition of any State of same-sex marriages. In his January 2005 State of the Union message, the President reaffirmed his support for the idea, but did not give a sense of how hard he will push.
In this short essay, we make some general observations on when amending the Federal Constitution is a wise thing to consider, and apply those observations to the question of gay marriage.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Amar, Vikram D. and Brownstein, Alan Edward, Why the Case for Amending the U.S. Constitution to Prohibit or Regulate Gay Marriage is 'Not Proved' (2005). Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 1 and 2, Fall 2004, Winter 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1954910
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.