In Search of the Transaction or Occurrence: Counterclaims

34 Pages Posted: 19 Nov 2011

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

The “transaction or occurrence” is the cornerstone of joinder in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A counterclaim arising out of the same transaction or occurrence as the claim is compulsory; a counterclaim not arising out of the same transaction or occurrence is permissive. A cross-claim must arise out of the transaction or occurrence of the claim or a counterclaim. A third-party defendant may assert a claim against the plaintiff that arises out of the transaction or occurrence of the claim; the plaintiff may return the favor. An amendment relates back when it arises out of the “conduct, transaction, or occurrence” of the original pleading. Permissive joinder of parties is allowed when the right to relief arises out of the same “transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences.” This article is about the one area of joinder that produces by far the most difficulty, judged by the volume of reported decisions: compulsory counterclaims. Part II of this article identifies the historical antecedents for the choice of transaction or occurrence as the base of the counterclaim rule. Part III explores the interpretation of transaction or occurrence in compulsory counterclaim cases by federal courts. Part IV argues for proper broad, fact-based interpretation of the transaction or occurrence in compulsory counterclaim cases.

This is a companion article to the following: McFarland, Douglas. "Seeing the Forest for the Trees: The Transaction or Occurrence and the Claim Interlock Civil Procedure," Florida Coastal Law Review, Vol. 12, no. 2, p. 247-304, 2011.

Keywords: Transaction, occurrence, joinder, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, counterclaim,

Suggested Citation

McFarland, Douglas D., In Search of the Transaction or Occurrence: Counterclaims (2007). Creighton Law Review, Vol. 40, p. 699, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1955269

Douglas D. McFarland (Contact Author)

Mitchell|Hamline School of Law ( email )

875 Summit Ave.
Saint Paul, MN 55105
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
256
Abstract Views
2,958
Rank
217,303
PlumX Metrics