The Justices Write Separately: Uses of the Concurrence by the Rehnquist Court

55 Pages Posted: 4 Dec 2011

See all articles by Laura Ray

Laura Ray

Widener University - Delaware Law School

Date Written: 1990

Abstract

The concurrence is a neglected element of appellate jurisprudence. Although there is a substantial literature about the dissent, little has been said about the role of the concurrence. This article identifies and examines the ways in which members of the Rehnquist Court have employed this flexible device to serve a variety of purposes. The limiting concurrence, the most traditional use, allows a member of the majority to qualify agreement through the caveat that the Court's opinion should apply only to the circumstances of the present case. In contrast, the expansive concurrence, a much less common use, seeks to enlarge the applicability of the majority opinion. The emphatic concurrence seeks only to underscore its author's view of the majority position. Finally, the doctrinal concurrence offers its own alternate theory to reach the majority's result; it is the quintessentially right result, wrong reason opinion. The consequences of the use of the concurrence include a substitution of a plurality opinion for a majority opinion, an obstacle to a purely unanimous opinion, or a splintered decision that undermines the force of a more cohesive outcome. Although critics of the Rehnquist Court have complained that such uses weaken the Court's authority, they may also provide benefits by deferring resolution of a difficult issue to a more suitable case, by illuminating for bench and bar the implications of a majority opinion, or by placing an opinion in context. Used with restraint, the concurrence may contribute to a more finely tuned jurisprudence.

Keywords: concurrence, Supreme Court, opinions, appellate jurisprudence, Rehnquist Court

JEL Classification: K1

Suggested Citation

Ray, Laura, The Justices Write Separately: Uses of the Concurrence by the Rehnquist Court (1990). UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 23, 1990, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1967690

Laura Ray (Contact Author)

Widener University - Delaware Law School ( email )

4601 Concord Pike
Wilmington, DE 19803-0406
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
109
Abstract Views
871
Rank
451,035
PlumX Metrics