The Crisis, Automatic Stabilisation, and the Stability Pact
26 Pages Posted: 15 Jan 2012 Last revised: 2 Feb 2012
Date Written: March 25, 2010
Abstract
This paper describes recent trends on the effectiveness of stabilisers in the European Union. Using both macro evidence on the cyclical sensitivity of budget deficit to economic activity and micro evidence on the tax and expenditure profiles, we conclude, in agreement with the recent literature, that the importance of automatic stabilisation has decreased. After remarking that this trend is contradictory with the current economic institutions of Europe, which rely exclusively on automatic stabilisation for the conduct of fiscal policy, we argue that increasing flexibility, one alternative way to reduce cyclical fluctuations, does not seem a viable path. The paper concludes defending the appropriateness of discretionary fiscal policy. We argue by means of a simple model that the theoretical arguments against its use are not conclusive, and we describe a recent stream of literature, based on structural VAR models, that concludes rather robustly for the effectiveness of discretionary fiscal policy in the short and long run.
Keywords: Automatic stabilisers, tax progressivity, unemployment benefits, discretionary fiscal policy, European fiscal institutions
JEL Classification: E6, H2, H3, H6
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Making Emu Work: Some Lessons from the 1990s
By Jörg Bibow
-
Can Monetary Policy Affect the Real Economy?
By Philip Arestis and Malcolm C. Sawyer
-
An Alternative Stability Pact for the European Union
By Philip Arestis, Kevin Mccauley, ...
-
Reflections on the Current Fashion for Central Bank Independence
By Jörg Bibow
-
The Nature and Role of Monetary Policy When Money is Endogenous
By Philip Arestis and Malcolm C. Sawyer
-
By Philip Arestis and Malcolm C. Sawyer
-
Easy Money Through the Back Door: The Markets vs. The ECB
By Jörg Bibow