C.K. Claridge, Inc.
Posted: 26 Jan 2012
Date Written: May 3, 2010
Abstract
Sued for patent infringement, chemical manufacturer C.K. Claridge tries to design a settlement strategy taking into account a decision analysis of litigating v. negotiating. The plaintiffs are the patent holder and its sole licensee, who is also a CKC competitor. (This case is a revised, alternative version of "C.K. Coolidge, Inc. (Abridged)," HBS No. 607-006.)
Learning Objective: Analyze the most useful analysis to craft negotiating strategy and tactics.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Sebenius, James K., C.K. Claridge, Inc. (May 3, 2010). Harvard Business School NOM Unit Case No. 910-045, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1991867
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.