A Big Question in Anti-Corruption: Institutional Monopoly or Multi-Agency Model?

Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, Vol. 23, pp. 64-89, 2008

Posted: 27 Jan 2012

See all articles by Ugur Emek

Ugur Emek

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Muhittin Acar

Hacettepe University

Date Written: September 1, 2008

Abstract

This study focuses on institutional choices in fighting against corruption. The article first compares and contrasts two institutional options in organizing the struggle against corruption: a single, powerful organization versus multiplicity of organizations, highlighting advantages and disadvantages of each. Then, the organizational structures and performances of the fight against corruption in twenty-five countries (including Turkey) are examined with the help of the data presented by some international organizations. It is noted that the establishment of a single, powerful institution is not the only organizational option and that the success in the fight against corruption can be achieved by increasing the authority, resources, independence and accountability of the existing relevant organizations. In addition, it is emphasized that the higher levels of openness, participation, and accountability embedded in the administrative system of the country are very important for success in the process of fighting against corruption. The study ends with a brief discussion.

Keywords: Anti-corruption, clean government, accountability, transparency, institutional design

JEL Classification: D73, H83, K42

Suggested Citation

Emek, Ugur and Acar, Muhittin, A Big Question in Anti-Corruption: Institutional Monopoly or Multi-Agency Model? (September 1, 2008). Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, Vol. 23, pp. 64-89, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1992662

Ugur Emek

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Muhittin Acar (Contact Author)

Hacettepe University ( email )

Ankara
Turkey

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
545
PlumX Metrics