Whom to Help? Immediacy Bias in Judgments and Decisions About Humanitarian Aid
11 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2012
Date Written: March 16, 2011
Abstract
People exhibit an immediacy bias when making judgments and decisions about humanitarian aid, perceiving as more deserving and donating disproportionately to humanitarian crises that happen to arouse immediate emotion. The immediacy bias produced different serial position effects, contingent on decision timing (Experiment 1). When making allocation decisions directly after viewing to four emotionally evocative films about four different humanitarian crises, participants donated disproportionately more to the final, immediate crisis, in contrast, when making donation decisions sequentially, after viewing each of the four crises, participants donated disproportionately to the immediate crisis. The immediacy bias was associated with "scope neglect." causing people to take action against relatively less deadly crises (Experiments 2 and 3). The immediacy bias emerged even when participants were warned about emotional manipulation (Experiment 3). The immediacy bias diminished over time, as immediate emotions presumably subsided (Experiment 2). Implications for charitable giving, serial position effects, and the influence of emotion on choice are discussed.
Keywords: decision making, order effects, serial position, affect, emotion, charitable giving
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Looking Forward, Looking Back: Anticipation is More Evocative than Retrospection
By Laurence Ashworth and Leaf Van Boven
-
Immediacy Bias in Emotion Perception: Current Emotions Seem More Intense than Previous Emotions
By Michaela Huber, Katherine White, ...
-
Feeling Close: Emotional Intensity Reduces Perceived Psychological Distance
By Leaf Van Boven, Joanne Kane, ...
-
A Policy Maker’s Dilemma: Preventing Terrorism or Preventing Blame
By A. Peter Mcgraw, Alexander Todorov, ...
-
What Determines Forecasters’ Forecasting Errors?
By Ingmar Nolte, Sandra Nolte (lechner), ...
-
By Tom Meyvis, Rebecca K. Ratner, ...
-
By Jeff Galak and Tom Meyvis
-
'Passing the Buck': Incongruence between Gender Role and Topic Leads to Avoidance of Negotiation
By Julia Bear
-
Predicting Premeditation: Future Behavior is Seen as More Intentional than Past Behavior
By Zachary C. Burns, Eugene M. Caruso, ...