Fictional Commodities in Asset Bubbles – Was Polanyi Right All Along?

20 Pages Posted: 9 Feb 2012

See all articles by Mark Findlay

Mark Findlay

Singapore Management University - Yong Pung How School of Law; Singapore Management University - Centre for AI & Data Governance

Date Written: February 8, 2012

Abstract

This paper seeks to understand what is to be regulated in market failure. Where the paper benefits but diverges from Polanyi’s analysis is to explore the global self-regulatory markets of today and to suggest that his differentiation of fictitious from socially-sustained (embedded) market relationships holds a key to why both regulation of contemporary political economy is failing, and why fictitious markets in fictitious relationships may be beyond regulation. Is there any analytical value in disentangling fictitious from embedded markets and rationalizing our regulatory resources on the latter while exposing the risks to healthy social relationships in proliferating the former? In this inquiry we are not so much interested in why bubbles burst, but why bubbles at all?

Keywords: market regulation, sustainability, market failure, sociability

JEL Classification: K10, K20, K22, K30

Suggested Citation

Findlay, Mark James, Fictional Commodities in Asset Bubbles – Was Polanyi Right All Along? (February 8, 2012). Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 12/09, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2001730

Mark James Findlay (Contact Author)

Singapore Management University - Yong Pung How School of Law ( email )

55 Armenian Street
Singapore, 179943
Singapore

Singapore Management University - Centre for AI & Data Governance ( email )

55 Armenian Street
Singapore
Singapore

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
139
Abstract Views
1,284
Rank
375,126
PlumX Metrics