Small Cues Change Savings Choices
48 Pages Posted: 20 Feb 2012 Last revised: 3 Apr 2023
There are 2 versions of this paper
Date Written: February 2012
Abstract
In randomized field experiments, we embedded one- to two-sentence anchoring, goal-setting, or savings threshold cues in emails to employees about their 401(k) savings plan. We find that anchors increase or decrease 401(k) contribution rates by up to 1.9% of income. A high savings goal example raises contribution rates by up to 2.2% of income. Highlighting a higher savings threshold in the match incentive structure raises contributions by up to 1.5% of income relative to highlighting the lower threshold. Highlighting the maximum possible contribution rate raises contribution rates by up to 2.9% of income among low savers.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Andrew Ang, Geert Bekaert, ...
-
By Andrew Ang, Geert Bekaert, ...
-
Individual Preferences, Monetary Gambles, and Stock Market Participation: A Case for Narrow Framing
By Nicholas Barberis, Ming Huang, ...
-
Optimal Portfolio Choice Under Loss Aversion
By Arjan B. Berkelaar, Roy Kouwenberg, ...
-
The Implications of First-Order Risk Aversion for Asset Market Risk Premiums
By Geert Bekaert, Robert J. Hodrick, ...
-
Portfolio Choice and Trading Volume with Loss Averse Investors
-
What Drives the Disposition Effect? An Analysis of a Long-Standing Preference-Based Explanation
By Nicholas Barberis and Wei Xiong
-
What Drives the Disposition Effect? An Analysis of a Long-Standing Preference-Based Explanation
By Nicholas Barberis and Wei Xiong
-
The Independence Axiom and Asset Returns
By Larry G. Epstein and Stanley E. Zin
-
Individual Preferences, Monetary Gambles and the Equity Premium
By Nicholas Barberis, Ming Huang, ...