Asymmetric Information and the Pecking (Dis)Order
42 Pages Posted: 20 Mar 2012 Last revised: 26 Jan 2020
Date Written: January 23, 2020
Abstract
We study the classical problem of raising capital under asymmetric information. Following Myers and Majluf (1984), we consider firms endowed with assets in place and riskier growth opportunities. When asymmetric information is concentrated on assets in place (rather than growth opportunities), equity-like securities are more likely to be optimal. In contrast, when asymmetric information falls on growth options, debt is optimal. Intuitively, this happens because when the asset with greater volatility is less affected by asymmetric information, issuing a security with greater exposure to upside potential (such as equity) can be less dilutive than issuing a security lacking such exposure (such as debt). Our results suggest that equity is more likely to dominate debt for younger firms with larger investment needs, endowed with riskier, more valuable growth opportunities. Thus, our model can explain why high-growth firms may prefer equity over debt, and then switch to debt financing as they mature.
Keywords: debt-equity choice, pecking order, asymmetric information, security design
JEL Classification: G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Investment Timing, Agency and Information
By Steven R. Grenadier and Neng Wang
-
Investment Timing, Agency, and Information
By Steven R. Grenadier and Neng Wang
-
The Dynamics of Mergers and Acquisitions in Oligopolistic Industries
By Jianjun Miao and Dirk Hackbarth
-
Corporate Investment and Financing Under Asymmetric Information
By Erwan Morellec and Norman Schuerhoff
-
Corporate Investment and Financing Under Asymmetric Information
By Erwan Morellec and Norman Schuerhoff
-
Real Options Signaling Games with Applications to Corporate Finance
-
By Gregor Matvos and Amit Seru
-
By Gregor Matvos and Amit Seru