A Re-Examination of the Motives and Gains in Joint Ventures

Posted: 25 Apr 2000

See all articles by Mark B. Houston

Mark B. Houston

Saint Louis University - Richard A. Chaifetz School of Business

Shane A. Johnson

Texas A&M University - Department of Finance

Abstract

We distinguish between horizontal and vertical joint ventures, and find correspondingly different valuation effects. Horizontal joint ventures create synergistic gains that are shared by the partners. In contrast, vertical joint ventures generate gains only for suppliers. This is similar to the pattern we find for simple contracts, which suggests economic similarities between vertical joint ventures and contracts. Analyzing firms' choices between these contracting options, we find that firms choose vertical joint ventures over simple contracts when potential hold-up problems are severe and when suppliers face finance constraints. The results do not support a risk-sharing motive for joint ventures.

JEL Classification: G34

Suggested Citation

Houston, Mark B. and Johnson, Shane A., A Re-Examination of the Motives and Gains in Joint Ventures. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=204628

Mark B. Houston

Saint Louis University - Richard A. Chaifetz School of Business

3674 Lindell Blvd
St. Louis, MO 63108-3397
United States

Shane A. Johnson (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University - Department of Finance ( email )

Mays School of Business
College Station, TX 77843-4218
United States
979-862-3318 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,141
PlumX Metrics