Report from the Certiorari Clinic: Impressions of Routine Capital Cases

Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 201-208, Fall 2005

Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper

Posted: 16 May 2012

See all articles by Daniel Givelber

Daniel Givelber

Northeastern University - School of Law

Date Written: May 16, 2012

Abstract

The Certiorari Clinic at Northeastern University School of Law provides students the opportunity to do useful work in death penalty cases in an abbreviated time frame (an academic quarter) by focusing on a single step present in virtually every case- the petition to the United States Supreme Court for a grant of certiorari. Over the past decade, students have prepared petitions in more than one hundred capital cases from a dozen different states. This Commentary explains how this enterprise is organized and why it is worthwhile. I also report upon what a decade of wide but shallow exposure to capital cases reveals in terms of the evidence and advocacy necessary to secure a conviction and death sentences. Death cases are consistently, if infrequently, pursued and won on the basis of evidence that should, but apparently does not, create more than a lingering doubt about guilt. When it comes to the evidence necessary for conviction and sentence, death is not different.

Suggested Citation

Givelber, Daniel James, Report from the Certiorari Clinic: Impressions of Routine Capital Cases (May 16, 2012). Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 201-208, Fall 2005, Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2060276

Daniel James Givelber (Contact Author)

Northeastern University - School of Law ( email )

416 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02115
United States
617-373-4298 (Phone)
617-373-5056 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
263
PlumX Metrics