The Ebb and Flow of Judicial Leadership in the Netherlands

10 Pages Posted: 21 May 2012

See all articles by Nick J. H. Huls

Nick J. H. Huls

Erasmus University of Rotterdam; Leiden University

Date Written: May 10, 2012

Abstract

In this paper I analyze the loss of traditional authority by the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad). This court is traditionally seen as the highest court of the Netherlands, but after decades of applause and admiration, today the court finds itself in a marginal position. The court failed to keep in touch with its environment and did not react adequately to some relevant changes, such as the rise of contenders like the Council of State (Raad van State) and the Council for the Judiciary (Raad voor de rechtspraak), the introduction of New Public Management (NPM), the complexity as a result of the creation of a European legal order and the debates about constitutionalism. In its splendid isolation the Hoge Raad thought - until recently - that these changes would leave its superior position at the top of the Dutch judiciary unchallenged. I analyze the causes of this loss of responsiveness of the court and suggest a broad form of modern judicial leadership as a means for the Hoge Raad to regain some of its lost territory.

Keywords: judicial leadership, cassation courts, internationalisation

Suggested Citation

Huls, Nick J. H., The Ebb and Flow of Judicial Leadership in the Netherlands (May 10, 2012). Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 129-138, May 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2063611

Nick J. H. Huls (Contact Author)

Erasmus University of Rotterdam ( email )

Burgemeester Oudlaan 50
3000 DR Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland 3062PA
Netherlands

Leiden University ( email )

Postbus 9500
Leiden, Zuid Holland 2300 RA
Netherlands

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
38
Abstract Views
366
PlumX Metrics