Intervention in Public Law Litigation: The Environmental Paradigm

98 Pages Posted: 7 Jun 2012

See all articles by Peter A. Appel

Peter A. Appel

University of Georgia - School of Law

Date Written: Spring 2000

Abstract

Litigation which Abram Chayes labeled “public law litigation” grew especially quickly in the decade immediately before Chayes wrote his landmark article. This growth was due, in no small part, to the 1966 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These amendments introduced a more transactional approach to litigation and made the rules concerning party structure more flexible. In particular, the amendments modified Rule 19, which governs joinder of nonparties by the parties to the suit; Rule 23, which governs class action lawsuits; and Rule 24, which governs intervention by nonparties into ongoing litigation. Using the jurisprudence that has developed concerning intervention as of right under Rule 24(a), this article questions these two assertions. First, courts have been receptive to amorphous party structure in public law cases, allowing intervention in many instances where it would not have been allowed before the 1966 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Second, it is far from clear in many instances how allowing intervention assists the litigation, particularly when the outsider has intervened as a defendant. Rather, in many instances the parties and the judge can realize the advantages of involving an outsider to the litigation without formal intervention as of right. Thus, contrary to the arguments of most scholars in this area, I believe that the courts have, for the most part, decided the cases correctly, and have certainly allowed intervention in more cases than they would have prior to the 1966 amendments.

Keywords: public law litigation, joinder of nonparties, class action, intervention by nonparties, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, environmental law

JEL Classification: K32, K41

Suggested Citation

Appel, Peter A., Intervention in Public Law Litigation: The Environmental Paradigm (Spring 2000). Washington University Law Review, Vol. 78, pp. 215-312, 2000, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2079135

Peter A. Appel (Contact Author)

University of Georgia - School of Law ( email )

225 Herty Drive
Athens, GA 30602
United States
(706) 542-5097 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
156
Abstract Views
578
Rank
340,106
PlumX Metrics