Transparent Financial Innovation in a Post-Crisis Environment

34 Pages Posted: 4 Jul 2012

See all articles by Panos Delimatsis

Panos Delimatsis

Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC); Tilburg Law School

Date Written: July 3, 2012

Abstract

The recent stunning failure of banks has put regulatory intervention high on the agenda of governments. Adequate risk monitoring, including by credit rating agencies, as well as measurement and management have proven a daunting task, whereas regulation of innovative financial instruments has not brought about adequate disclosure and transparency. Before the recent financial crisis, financial innovation was regarded as inextricably linked with economic growth and aggregate welfare. In the wake of the crisis, criticism as to the utility of financial innovation became more unequivocal. After reviewing the virtues and pitfalls of financial innovation, the paper analyses the main transparency initiatives undertaken in the EU and the US in the aftermath of the crisis to harness various financial innovations that have marked the history of financial markets in the past three decades, including hedge funds, derivatives and credit ratings. Furthermore, the paper critically assesses the likely impact of such regulations on the future of financial innovation. In addition, the paper reviews the approach to financial innovation that the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) adopted in the 1990s and assesses the likely impact of the recent financial crisis on this stance. As the perimeter of regulation grows and countries become more suspicious about home-country financial regulation, trade in financial services is unlikely to remain unaffected. Nevertheless, the GATS appears to be running out of analytical tools, a fact that undermines its global role. The emergence of a new international financial architecture, including the upgrade of the FSB, the BIS and the IMF, exemplifies a shift of power away from the GATS in favour of this new matrix of specialized institutions. Within this new landscape, the GATS is bound to change – or become irrelevant.

Keywords: financial innovation, transparency, Dodd-Frank Act, financial regulation, financial services trade, EU, GATS

JEL Classification: F02, F10, F20, F30, F40

Suggested Citation

Delimatsis, Panagiotis, Transparent Financial Innovation in a Post-Crisis Environment (July 3, 2012). Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), 3rd Biennial Global Conference, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2099167 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2099167

Panagiotis Delimatsis (Contact Author)

Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC) ( email )

Warandelaan 2
Postbus 90153
Tilburg, NL-5000 LE
Netherlands
0031 13 466 8251 (Phone)
0031 13 466 8047 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.tilburguniversity.edu/staff/p-delimatsis

Tilburg Law School ( email )

Warandelaan 2
Postbus 90153
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/staff/p-delimatsis

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
215
Abstract Views
1,278
Rank
257,119
PlumX Metrics