Decision-Making by Consensus in the WTO

29 Pages Posted: 4 Aug 2012 Last revised: 9 Sep 2012

See all articles by Thanh Nguyen

Thanh Nguyen

Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam; University of Barcelona - Faculty of Law

Quynh Nguyen

Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam

Phong Pham

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: August 3, 2012

Abstract

Decision-making processes are among the most important methods of functioning against which the legitimacy of one institution may be rated. It is because they show how the organization treats its members and thereby fulfils the first and minimal level of accountability. Moreover, in the recent trend of international fora, especially the WTO, decision-making by consensus has become popular. This characteristic of the WTO makes it considerably and significantly different from other international institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB), where decisions are based on weighted voting. In the WTO, consensus based decision-making is popular, while voting is possible and/or mandatory only in some special cases. In voting process, each member state has one vote and therefore allowing equal status to all members irrespective of trade shares or general economic size. The principle of equality of voting status of member states is clearly seen in the formal structures of the WTO. The top body of the WTO is the Ministerial Conference, which meets every two years. The day-to-day workings of the WTO are carried out by the General Council. The General Council also meets in the guise of the Trade Policy Review Body and the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). Below the General Council are the Councils for Goods, Services and Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), along with Committees that report directly to the General Council. Representation at all three levels is open to all members of the WTO. The provisions stipulate the use of consensus and voting in the WTO covered Agreements will be examined in the first section.

The advantages and disadvantages of consensus are the core discussion in section 2. On the one hand, consensus in decision-making offers developing countries with equal voice with their developed partners irrespective of trade shares and economic sizes. On the other hand, from the viewpoint of developing countries, they have to face a lot of disadvantages deriving from the consensus based decision-making.

Finally, in order to help WTO become the most democratic, efficient, transparent and legitimate organization in promoting international trade, some recommendations about the reform of the WTO in the field of decision-making are raised.

Keywords: Decision-making, consensus, WTO, developing countries, impact

Suggested Citation

Nguyen, Thanh and Nguyen, Quynh and Pham, Phong, Decision-Making by Consensus in the WTO (August 3, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2122948 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2122948

Thanh Nguyen

Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam ( email )

69 Chua Lang Street, Dong Da, Hanoi, Vietnam
Hanoi, Hanoi Hanoi 1000
Vietnam

University of Barcelona - Faculty of Law ( email )

Faculty of Law
Diagonal, 684
Barcelona, Barcelona 08034
Spain

Quynh Nguyen

Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam ( email )

69 Chua Lang Street, Dong Da, Hanoi, Vietnam
Hanoi, Hanoi Hanoi 1000
Vietnam

Phong Pham (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,422
Abstract Views
6,697
Rank
25,223
PlumX Metrics