Crime, Responsibility and Institutional Design

In M Smith, R Goodin & G Brennan (eds), Common Minds (OUP 2007) 182-198

Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 58

31 Pages Posted: 16 Aug 2012 Last revised: 24 Aug 2012

See all articles by Nicola Lacey

Nicola Lacey

London School of Economics - Law School

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

This paper addresses certain aspects of two questions to which Philip Pettit’s work has made an important contribution. First, given both our normative commitments and our understanding of human psychology and the social world, how can we best design institutions of criminal justice? Second, what role does the concept of human responsibility play in the legitimation of criminalizing power, and how do normative and social analyses of responsibility interact in contributing to our understanding of this question?

Keywords: responsibility, criminal justice, legitimation, coordination, institutional design

Suggested Citation

Lacey, Nicola, Crime, Responsibility and Institutional Design (2007). In M Smith, R Goodin & G Brennan (eds), Common Minds (OUP 2007) 182-198, Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 58, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2126583 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2126583

Nicola Lacey (Contact Author)

London School of Economics - Law School ( email )

Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
82
Abstract Views
587
Rank
547,206
PlumX Metrics