How to Ensure Consistency between Discount Rates and Cash Flows?

The Valuation Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 4-45, 2011

Posted: 12 Aug 2012

Date Written: December 7, 2011

Abstract

There is a lot of confusion among practitioners about valuing firms and investment projects. At the first sight the discounting procedure is a simple and routine task, which does not involve much effort. But actually even in simple cases accurate valuation requires attention to plenty of details. The slightest negligence or insufficient knowledge of underlying theory can result in substantial inaccuracy. Especially, many mistakes occur in the formulation of cost of levered equity and weighted average cost of capital.

The paper examines consistency between cash flows and discount rates. It reveals limitations and implicit assumptions embedded in traditional textbook formulas of CoLE and WACC. Traditional formulations were designed to value perpetuities and relies on constant target market debt-to-equity ratio, the assumption that tax shield on interest expense is earned in full and do not distinguish between payment of interest and repayment of principals. When applied to finite cash flow traditional formulations produce significant distortions. This paper summarizes correct formulations of discount rates for various types of cash flows according to recipients, realization and duration criteria. It also provides a practical example of correct calculations in Excel spreadsheet.

Keywords: Valuation, Cash Flow, WACC, Cost of Equity, Financial Leverage, Cost of Levered Equity, Cost of Unlevered Equity

JEL Classification: M21, M40, M46, M41, G12, G31, J33

Suggested Citation

Cheremushkin, Sergei Vasilievich, How to Ensure Consistency between Discount Rates and Cash Flows? (December 7, 2011). The Valuation Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 4-45, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2128174

Sergei Vasilievich Cheremushkin (Contact Author)

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
623
PlumX Metrics