Early American Judicial Pragmatism, 1793-1949

55 Pages Posted: 19 Oct 2012

Date Written: October 19, 2012

Abstract

After the writings of Charles S. Peirce and William James became popular among intellectuals in the early twentieth century, American judges started to use pragmatic parlance to decide cases. Starting with a trilogy of opinions by Supreme Court of Florida Justice Thomas M. Shackelford, a variety of prominent jurists deployed pragmatic analysis in their opinions. These judges included Benjamin Cardozo, Learned Hand, Robert Jackson, and Jerome Frank. American judicial theorists can learn a lot from this early use of pragmatism language in judicial opinions written before 1950.

Keywords: pragmatism, judicial analysis

Suggested Citation

Blomquist, Robert F., Early American Judicial Pragmatism, 1793-1949 (October 19, 2012). Valparaiso University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-13, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2164354 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2164354

Robert F. Blomquist (Contact Author)

Valparaiso University Law School ( email )

656 S. Greenwich St.
Valparaiso, IN 46383-6493
United States
219-465-7857 (Phone)
219-465-7872 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
128
Abstract Views
935
Rank
399,871
PlumX Metrics