Misinterpreting the Judicial Independence

Journal of JTRI, Issue- XXX, (December 2008), page 123-126

5 Pages Posted: 6 Nov 2012 Last revised: 4 Dec 2012

See all articles by Anoop Kumar

Anoop Kumar

National Academy of Legal Studies and Research; Dr. RMLNLU

Date Written: November 5, 2012

Abstract

From the ‘Basic Structure doctrine1’ to the ‘Natural Justice principle2’, from Golaknath 3 judgment to the Keshavanand Bharati4 judgment, the Indian judiciary has treaded a long way to act as a guardian of the Constitution rather than mere an adjudicating body. Whenever the Executive or Legislature tried to exceed their jurisdictions, it was the Judiciary, which always got both the wings back to the track. Due to the spate of its landmark judgment, the judiciary in India commanded a profound respect. Those who tended to question the freedom and impartiality of the Judiciary had to think many a times before harbouring such fallacies. No doubt, the previous impressive record of the Indian judiciary is evident of its viability.

Keywords: judiciary, corruption, India, scams

Suggested Citation

Kumar, Anoop, Misinterpreting the Judicial Independence (November 5, 2012). Journal of JTRI, Issue- XXX, (December 2008), page 123-126 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2171101 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2171101

Anoop Kumar (Contact Author)

National Academy of Legal Studies and Research ( email )

3-4-761, Barkatpura
Shameerpet
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500027
India

Dr. RMLNLU ( email )

Sec- D1, LDA Colony
Kanpur Road Scheme
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226012
India

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
66
Abstract Views
413
Rank
617,383
PlumX Metrics