The Speed of Information Revelation and Eventual Price Quality in Markets with Insiders: Comparing Two Theories

Review of Finance, Forthcoming

34 Pages Posted: 28 Nov 2012

See all articles by Peter Bossaerts

Peter Bossaerts

University of Cambridge

Cary Frydman

University of Southern California - Marshall School of Business

John O. Ledyard

California Institute of Technology - Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences

Date Written: November 27, 2012

Abstract

Two theoretical literatures, one using Bayesian Nash equilibrium, and the other using noisy rational expectations equilibrium, both provide a foundation for understanding how private information is impounded into asset prices, yet some of their predictions are conflicting. Here, we compare for the first time, the two theories using data from carefully controlled laboratory asset markets. In the dynamics, we find strong evidence for Bayesian Nash equilibrium theory, while final prices support predictions of the noisy rational expectations equilibrium theory. Finally, we document that price volatility increases when information is being impounded in prices.

Keywords: market microstruture, noisy rational expectations, experimental finance, Bayesian Nash equilibrium

JEL Classification: G12, G14, C92

Suggested Citation

Bossaerts, Peter L. and Frydman, Cary and Ledyard, John O., The Speed of Information Revelation and Eventual Price Quality in Markets with Insiders: Comparing Two Theories (November 27, 2012). Review of Finance, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2181697

Peter L. Bossaerts

University of Cambridge ( email )

Faculty of Economics
Cambridge, CB3 9DD
United Kingdom

Cary Frydman (Contact Author)

University of Southern California - Marshall School of Business ( email )

701 Exposition Blvd
Los Angeles, CA California 90089
United States

John O. Ledyard

California Institute of Technology - Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences ( email )

1200 East California Blvd.
228-77
Pasadena, CA 91125
United States
626-395-8482 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
141
Abstract Views
1,146
Rank
373,825
PlumX Metrics