Badiou and Žižek on Mallarmé: The Critique of Object-Art

Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 16, 2012

11 Pages Posted: 20 Jan 2020

See all articles by Daniel Hourigan

Daniel Hourigan

Griffith University - Socio-Legal Research Centre

Date Written: November 29, 2012

Abstract

This paper examines the differences between Alain Badiou and Slavoj Žižek’s articulations of ‘impossibility’ in their readings of the French experimental symbolist poet Stephane Mallarmé. The discussion will focus on how Badiou and Žižek diverge in their respective understandings of impossibility as a hallmark of the Lacanian Real in Mallarmé’s oeuvre. This difference is framed in light of the way that Badiou and Žižek consonantly turn to the modernist poet Mallarmé to understand the conditions under which the subject can attempt to access this imperative/idea. Herein it will be shown that two relations become apparent: ‘subtraction’ and ‘purification’; 'subtraction’ as the removal of the imaginary contents from the subject’s self-relation in an attempt to access the future antérieur and ‘purification’ as the attempt to purify the pure idea by locating the opaque core of the aesthetic object as the point of failure in the relation with the object.

Keywords: Alain Badiou, Slavoj Žižek, Stephane Mallarmé, Jacques Lacan, psychoanalysis, philosophy, materialism, ontology, aesthetics, art

Suggested Citation

Hourigan, Daniel, Badiou and Žižek on Mallarmé: The Critique of Object-Art (November 29, 2012). Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 16, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2182891

Daniel Hourigan (Contact Author)

Griffith University - Socio-Legal Research Centre ( email )

Australia
+61 7 37354285 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
157
Abstract Views
772
Rank
342,626
PlumX Metrics