Акцессорность Обеспечительных Обязательств: Европейская Правовая Традиция и Российская Практика. Часть 2 (The Accessoriness of the Secuity Rights: A European Tradition and Russian Legal Practice: Part 2)

Civil Law Review, No 6, pp. 5-48, 2012

45 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2013

See all articles by Roman Bevzenko

Roman Bevzenko

National Research University Higher School of Economics (Moscow) - Department of Private Law; Russian School of Private Law

Date Written: December 1, 2012

Abstract

In his paper the author examines the dimensions of accessory (ancillary) nature of the security rights – both personal and real. The study of advantages and disadvantages of the accessoriness principle, the directions of weakening of accessoriness are also the subject of the paper.

Note: Downloadable document is in Russian.

Keywords: personal and real security rights, accessoriness principle, pledge, mortgage, suretyship, independent guaranty

Suggested Citation

Bevzenko, Roman, Акцессорность Обеспечительных Обязательств: Европейская Правовая Традиция и Российская Практика. Часть 2 (The Accessoriness of the Secuity Rights: A European Tradition and Russian Legal Practice: Part 2) (December 1, 2012). Civil Law Review, No 6, pp. 5-48, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2223102 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2223102

Roman Bevzenko (Contact Author)

National Research University Higher School of Economics (Moscow) - Department of Private Law ( email )

Moscow
Russia

Russian School of Private Law ( email )

Ilyinka str. 8 bld. 2
Moscow, 103132
Russia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
612
Abstract Views
1,832
Rank
81,481
PlumX Metrics