Women's High-Consequence Decision Making: A Nonstatic and Complex Choice Process

13 Pages Posted: 4 Mar 2013

See all articles by Cäzilia Loibl

Cäzilia Loibl

The Ohio State University - Department of Human Sciences

Jonghee Lee

Ohio State University (OSU)

Jonathan J. Fox

Ohio State University (OSU) - Department of Human Sciences

Erin Mentel-Gaeta

Cephas Capital Management, LLC

Abstract

The choice processes women investors employ when making mutual fund decisions in employer-based retirement plans were examined. A qualitative analysis of focus group material was used to investigate women’s decision making environments and strategies employed for this high-consequence decision. Interpretation of extracts from the focus groups suggests that the observed lack of investment information, reliance on simplified decision heuristics, and dependence on decision making guidance from others characterize largely constructive choice processes. The results emphasize the nonstatic and complex nature of women’s investment decision making.

Keywords: consumer psychology, decision making, portfolio choice, women investors

Suggested Citation

Loibl, Cäzilia and Lee, Jonghee and Fox, Jonathan J. and Mentel-Gaeta, Erin, Women's High-Consequence Decision Making: A Nonstatic and Complex Choice Process. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2228381

Cäzilia Loibl (Contact Author)

The Ohio State University - Department of Human Sciences ( email )

1787 Neil Avenue
265K Campbell Hall
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
614-292-4226 (Phone)

Jonghee Lee

Ohio State University (OSU) ( email )

Blankenship Hall-2010
901 Woody Hayes Drive
Columbus, OH OH 43210
United States

Jonathan J. Fox

Ohio State University (OSU) - Department of Human Sciences ( email )

United States
614-292-4561 (Phone)
614-292-7536 (Fax)

Erin Mentel-Gaeta

Cephas Capital Management, LLC ( email )

3478 North High Street
Columbus, OH 43214
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
728
Rank
670,101
PlumX Metrics