Instructive Past: Lessons from the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples for the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Indian Residential Schools
Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 2012, Volume 27, No. 1, pp. 101–127, doi:10.3138/cjls.27.1.101
28 Pages Posted: 12 Mar 2013 Last revised: 7 Apr 2013
Date Written: October 2, 2011
Abstract
Over time, the Canadian state has used a variety of mechanisms to address its troubled relationship with its indigenous population, the most prominent of which so far was the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP). RCAP was mandated to develop both a constitutional framework and a comprehensive social welfare policy. Staffed predominantly with constitutional lawyers, it articulated a sophisticated constitutional theory, which was not implemented, and did little to ameliorate the living conditions of Aboriginal people. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Indian Residential Schools (TRC), while arising from the settlement of a national class action, can be seen as a successor commission to RCAP. It follows in the procedural footprints of RCAP in a number of ways, including in the profile of its key appointments. This article argues that looking back at the successes and failures of RCAP can be instructive for the TRC as it carries out its mandate, allowing us to predict some areas that will be particularly challenging. In these areas, the TRC will require a departure from the RCAP blueprint if it is to achieve the ambitious goals of a TRC in a non-transitional-justice context.
Keywords: Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Indian Residential Schools, Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, establishing and mandating truth commissions, evaluating truth commissions
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation