Static-99R: Item #1 – What is the Offenders Age?: A Lack of Consensus Leads to a Defective Actuarial

24 Pages Posted: 24 Mar 2013

Date Written: March 22, 2013

Abstract

There is a disagreement regarding how to score the Static-99R that causes a significant difference in an individual’s score on the test. This situation appears to stem with the test developers, who have themselves shown an inconsistency in the interpretation and application of the coding rules regarding Item #1. The test developers have offered the opinions that this item refers to the offender’s current age but have also proposed that this item refers to the offender’s age at some point in the past. As a result, different scores can be found for the same offender. This inter-rater reliability concern is then debated in court and each clinician can point to supportive statements, publications, and research by the test developers to support the score they have found. This inter-rater reliability concern suggests that this test is defective, and should not be used in cases where the offender’s last sexual offense was more than two years ago.

Keywords: Static-99, Static-99R, sex offender, sexually violent predator

Suggested Citation

Cauley, Dean and Brownfield, Michelle, Static-99R: Item #1 – What is the Offenders Age?: A Lack of Consensus Leads to a Defective Actuarial (March 22, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2237968 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2237968

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
156
Abstract Views
930
Rank
344,530
PlumX Metrics