Distributional Consequences of Transnational Private Regulation: Institutional Complementarity as a Structural Source of Power in Global Product and Financial Markets

Duke University Rethinking Regulation Working Paper No. 6

49 Pages Posted: 24 Mar 2013

See all articles by Tim Buthe

Tim Buthe

Technische Universität München (TUM) - School of Governance - Hochschule für Politik

Date Written: March 18, 2013

Abstract

Transnational regulations, often established by private bodies, play a large and important role in the international political economy. This paper makes two contributions to the literature on transnational regulation. First, governments and international organization often legitimate the delegation of regulatory authority to transnational private bodies with efficiency gains. It is rare, however, that the alleged gains are empirically examined, which requires a comparative analysis vis-à-vis other regulatory regimes. I contrast rule-making for manufactured goods and financial reporting, where a single transnational private body is the clear focal point for rule-making at the international level, with purely domestic regulatory regimes and the prior attempts to establish international product and financial standards through negotiations between governments or public regulators. I show that the shift to transnational (private) regulation indeed brought real, substantial gains in the effectiveness and efficiency of rule-making. Second, I scrutinize the distributional consequences of transnational private regulation, which I submit are closely related to the efficiency gains. Here, the existing literature focuses on the distribution of the financial costs and benefits of specific rules among those who are the targets of such rules, given a particular regulatory regime. Institutional complementarity theory provides a powerful analytical framework for examining such distributional effects. In this paper, I push the framework further to examine the distributional consequences of the shift to transnational private regulation. I argue that this shift has persistent structural consequences for the relative power of a broad range of stakeholders (both within and across countries) and thus for their regulatory capabilities.

Keywords: regulation, product standards, financial reporting standards, transnational private regulation, distributional consequences, power, globalization, accounting

JEL Classification: F02, F13, F33, G18, G38, K20, L50, M21, M41

Suggested Citation

Buthe, Tim, Distributional Consequences of Transnational Private Regulation: Institutional Complementarity as a Structural Source of Power in Global Product and Financial Markets (March 18, 2013). Duke University Rethinking Regulation Working Paper No. 6, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2238100 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2238100

Tim Buthe (Contact Author)

Technische Universität München (TUM) - School of Governance - Hochschule für Politik ( email )

Richard-Wagner-Str.1
Munich, 80333
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
126
Abstract Views
1,506
Rank
407,917
PlumX Metrics