Uncovering Dividend Growth Predictability: New Evidence from the Post-WW II Period
55 Pages Posted: 25 Mar 2013 Last revised: 23 Jun 2015
Date Written: June 22, 2015
Abstract
We re-visit a puzzling result that in U.S. post-WW II data the dividend price ratio can predict aggregate returns but not dividend growth. We find that predictive regressions are sensitive to the method used to aggregate firm-level data. Using value weighted firm-level data we find strong evidence for dividend growth predictability in the post-WW II period. We explore the reasons behind the differences in predictability due to different weighting methods. We find that these differences in predictability are related to the fact, in the data, that it is not always the largest firms that pay the largest dollar dividends or earnings.
Keywords: asset pricing, dividend growth predictability, present-value model, predictability of stock returns, weighting of firm dividends, changes in dividend payments, quintiles, earnings
JEL Classification: C22, E44, G1, G12, G14, G35
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Consumption, Aggregate Wealth and Expected Stock Returns
By Martin Lettau and Sydney C. Ludvigson
-
Risks for the Long Run: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles
By Ravi Bansal and Amir Yaron
-
Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns: Alternative Procedures for Interference and Measurement
-
Resurrecting the (C)Capm: A Cross-Sectional Test When Risk Premia are Time-Varying
By Martin Lettau and Sydney C. Ludvigson
-
Stock Return Predictability: Is it There?
By Geert Bekaert and Andrew Ang
-
Stock Return Predictability: Is it There?
By Geert Bekaert and Andrew Ang
-
Resurrecting the (C)Capm: A Cross-Sectional Test When Risk Premia Wre Time-Varying
By Martin Lettau and Sydney C. Ludvigson