Remedies in Animal-Related Litigation

Litigating Animal Disputes: A Complete Guide for Lawyers 437 (Joan Schaffner & Julie Fershtman eds., 2009)

GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-70

GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2013-70

26 Pages Posted: 7 Apr 2013

See all articles by Joan E. Schaffner

Joan E. Schaffner

George Washington University - Law School

Date Written: 2002

Abstract

This chapter discusses the challenges of determining appropriate remedies in cases involving animals with a focus on companion animals. Damages fall into one of two categories: substitutionary relief, which is based on the value of loss of the animal, and specific relief, which “seeks to either avoid harm, undo the harm, or repair the harm in kind.” In private law cases the primary relief sought is substitutionary damages. The changing role of companion animals in people’s lives is leading to an expanding range of available damages, such as companionship value, emotional distress and punitive damages. Of course, the jurisdiction’s substantive law governs the availability of damages.

Keywords: property, damages, economic loss

JEL Classification: K11, K12, K13, K39

Suggested Citation

Schaffner, Joan E., Remedies in Animal-Related Litigation (2002). Litigating Animal Disputes: A Complete Guide for Lawyers 437 (Joan Schaffner & Julie Fershtman eds., 2009), GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-70, GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2013-70, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2245669

Joan E. Schaffner (Contact Author)

George Washington University - Law School ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-494-0354 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
410
Rank
658,995
PlumX Metrics