On the Invalidation of Terms in Contracts of Adhesion

36 Pages Posted: 8 Apr 2013 Last revised: 5 Oct 2013

Date Written: April 6, 2013

Abstract

This Note argues that judges should invalidate terms in contracts of adhesion that place the risk of loss on the costlier cost-avoider or that grant an option to one of the parties to impose non-reciprocal costs on the other. It goes on to justify this rule, arguing that it minimizes both the primary and secondary costs of contracts of adhesion.

Suggested Citation

Tutt, Andrew, On the Invalidation of Terms in Contracts of Adhesion (April 6, 2013). 30 Yale J. on Reg. 439 (2013), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2246122

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
199
Abstract Views
1,407
Rank
276,074
PlumX Metrics