Natural and Quasi- Experiments in Economics
44 Pages Posted: 25 May 2006 Last revised: 21 Jun 2023
Date Written: December 1994
Abstract
Using research designs patterned after randomized experiments, many recent economic studies examine outcome measures for treatment groups and comparison groups that are not randomly assigned. By using variation in explanatory variables generated by changes in state laws, government draft mechanisms, or other means, these studies obtain variation that is readily examined and is plausibly exogenous. This paper describes the advantages of these studies and suggests how they can be improved. It also provides aids in judging the validity of inferences they draw. Design complications such as multiple treatment and comparison groups and multiple pre- or post-intervention observations are advocated.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
By Marianne Bertrand, Esther Duflo, ...
-
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
By Marianne Bertrand, Esther Duflo, ...
-
Wage and Employment Effects of the Olympic Games in Atlanta 1996 Reconsidered
By Arne Feddersen and Wolfgang Maennig
-
The Effect of Medicare Coverage for the Disabled on the Market for Private Insurance
By John F. Cogan, Daniel P. Kessler, ...
-
Sports Heroes and Mass Sports Participation – the (Double) Paradox of the 'German Tennis Boom'
By Arne Feddersen and Wolfgang Maennig
-
Clustering or Scattering: The Underlying Reason for Regulating Distance Among Retail Outlets