The Apology in Civil Liability: Underused and Undervalued?

(2013) 115 Precedent 28-31

UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2013-34

9 Pages Posted: 7 Jun 2013

See all articles by Prue E. Vines

Prue E. Vines

University of New South Wales (UNSW)

Date Written: June 6, 2013

Abstract

Australian jurisdictions have introduced the protected apology, but it is undermined by the variation across the jurisdictions in relation to what aspects of civil liability it applies to, the definitions of apology and lack of knowledge of its existence in the community. The author discusses the problems with the apology protecting laws, particularly in the area of medical malpractice, and suggests three ways to enhance their effectiveness – putting them in stand-alone statutes, make them apply to all forms of civil liability, and define apology to include acknowledgement of fault in all legislation. Only in this way will they achieve what was intended when they were enacted.

Suggested Citation

Vines, Prue E., The Apology in Civil Liability: Underused and Undervalued? (June 6, 2013). (2013) 115 Precedent 28-31, UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2013-34, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2275208

Prue E. Vines (Contact Author)

University of New South Wales (UNSW) ( email )

Kensington
High St
Sydney, NSW 2052
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
221
Abstract Views
865
Rank
250,507
PlumX Metrics