Horizontal Equity: New Measures, Unclear Principles
27 Pages Posted: 16 May 2000 Last revised: 29 Nov 2022
There are 2 versions of this paper
Horizontal Equity: New Measures, Unclear Principles
Date Written: April 2000
Abstract
Alan Auerbach and Kevin Hassett offer a new measure of horizontal equity (HE) that is designed to overcome deficiencies in prior indexes. There is, however, a fundamental problem that their effort shares with their predecessors' attempts: the underlying rationale for pursuing HE at the expense of individuals' well-being is never stated. Moreover, as discussed here, it appears that no plausible rationale can be given because the essence of HE involves giving weight to morally arbitrary factors. Indeed, pursuing HE may even conflict with the Pareto principle. On reflection, it seems that the appeal of HE is specious: HE does not possess intrinsic value, but rather is a rough proxy concept that may signal various ways in which unequal treatment of individuals can lead to a loss in social welfare. Unfortunately, HE indexes are not very useful even with regard to HE's proxy role.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Horizontal Equity: Measures in Search of a Principle
By Louis Kaplow
-
Utilitarianism and Horizontal Equity: The Case for Random Taxation
-
A New Measure of Horizontal Equity
By Alan J. Auerbach and Kevin A. Hassett
-
An Atkinson-Gini Family of Social Evaluation Functions
By Jean-yves Duclos and Abdelkrim Araar
-
A Fundamental Objection to Tax Equity Norms: A Call for Utilitarianism
By Louis Kaplow
-
A Fundamental Objection to Tax Equity Norms: A Call for Utilitarianism
By Louis Kaplow
-
Horizontal Equity: New Measures, Unclear Principles
By Louis Kaplow
-
A Normative and Statistical Approach to Measuring Classical Horizontal Inequity
By Jean-yves Duclos and Peter J. Lambert
-
A Normative Approach to Measuring Classical Horizontal Inequity
By Jean-yves Duclos and Peter J. Lambert