Generational Risk - is it a Big Deal?: Simulating an 80-Period OLG Model with Aggregate Shocks
42 Pages Posted: 29 Jun 2013 Last revised: 29 May 2022
There are 3 versions of this paper
Generational Risk – Is It a Big Deal? Simulating an 80-Period OLG Model with Aggregate Shocks
Generational Risk - is it a Big Deal?: Simulating an 80-Period OLG Model with Aggregate Shocks
Generational Risk -- Is It a Big Deal? Simulating an 80-Period OLG Model with Aggregate Shocks
Date Written: June 2013
Abstract
The theoretical literature presumes generational risk is large enough to merit study and that such risk can be meaningfully shared via appropriate government policies. This paper assesses these propositions. It develops an 80-period OLG model to directly measure generational risk and the extent to which it can be mitigated via financial markets or Social Security. The model is trend stationary as is common in the literature. It features isoelastic preferences, moderate risk aversion, Cobb-Douglas technology, and shocks to both TFP and capital depreciation. Our computation method builds on Marcet (1988), Marcet and Marshall (1994), and Judd, Maliar, and Maliar (2009, 2011), who overcome the curse of dimensionality by limiting a model's state space to its ergodic set. Our baseline calibration uses the literature's estimate of the TFP shock process and sets depreciation shocks to match the variability of the return to U.S. wealth. The baseline results feature higher than observed output variability. Nonetheless, we find relatively little generational risk. This calibration produces a very small risk premium. Resolving this puzzle by adding increasing borrowing costs does not affect our conclusions regarding the size of generational risk. Our second calibration increases depreciation shocks, as in Krueger and Kubler (2006), to match the model's return variability with that of the equity market. Doing so reproduces the equity premium (even absent borrowing costs), but substantially overstates the variability of output and wages. This calibration generates significant cross-generational risk. Under both calibrations, the one-period bond market is very effective in sharing risks among contemporaneous generations. But the simulated sizes of short and long bond positions associated with unrestricted use of this market appear unrealistically large. Finally, we find that Social Security can be effective in reducing generational risk no matter its initial size.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Pareto Improving Social Security Reform When Financial Markets are Incomplete?
By Dirk Krueger and Felix Kubler
-
Pareto Improving Social Security Reform When Financial Markets are Incomplete
By Dirk Krueger and Felix Kubler
-
Intergenerational Risk Sharing
By Roger H. Gordon and Hal R. Varian
-
By N. Gregory Mankiw and Laurence Ball
-
By Laurence Ball and N. Gregory Mankiw
-
Intergenerational Risk-Sharing and Risk-Taking of a Pension Fund
-
Social Security and Risk Sharing
By Piero Gottardi and Felix Kubler