Rethinking the Testamentary Capacity of Minors

50 Pages Posted: 5 Sep 2013 Last revised: 13 Jun 2014

See all articles by Mark Glover

Mark Glover

University of South Carolina School of Law

Date Written: June 11, 2014

Abstract

Minors lack the legal capacity to execute wills. Subject to limited exceptions in some states, a will executed by a child is void. Because this testamentary age requirement conflicts with the primary objective of the law of wills, which is to allow decedents to freely choose how their estates will be distributed, this rule should be founded upon a coherent and compelling policy rationale. Nonetheless, it is not.

Three potential rationales might explain the testamentary incapacity of minors. First, the age requirement could represent a categorical capacity threshold that is aimed at protecting children from their immaturity and indiscretion. Second, the age requirement could be seen as a proxy for the minimum mental competency that the law requires of all testators. Finally, the age requirement could implement forced parental inheritance, under which the estates of minors are funneled into intestacy and are distributed to their parents.

This article explains how each of these potential rationales fails to adequately align with the mechanics of the current testamentary age requirement. The article ultimately calls for the elimination of the categorical age restriction on testamentary capacity. It also proposes additional reforms that would better serve the policy objectives of the testamentary age restriction but that would allow children to more frequently execute wills.

Keywords: testamentary capacity

Suggested Citation

Glover, Mark, Rethinking the Testamentary Capacity of Minors (June 11, 2014). 79 Missouri Law Review 69 (2014), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2321200

Mark Glover (Contact Author)

University of South Carolina School of Law ( email )

1525 Senate Street
Columbia, SC 29208
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
156
Abstract Views
1,774
Rank
341,599
PlumX Metrics