Divergent Directions in Reforming Legal Responses to Lethal Violence
(2012) Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, Vol. 45, Issue 3, pp. 318-336
38 Pages Posted: 11 Sep 2013
Date Written: 2012
Abstract
Over the past three decades, debates about legal reforms to lethal violence have been evident across Australia and in other jurisdictions. While these debates have often arisen from shared concerns, the resulting reforms have taken different approaches to reformulating the defences to murder. This article considers the divergent approaches taken to reform and the process of law reform itself, documenting the significance of localised histories and high profile cases. It also questions whether reforms to the defences to murder have responded adequately to the varying contexts within which men and women kill. The analysis reveals the limitations of law reform inquiries that fail to take a comprehensive approach to considering the operation of the laws in this area. The article calls for ongoing critical analysis of homicide within and beyond the law.
Keywords: Homicide Law Reform, Defences to Murder, Provocation, Self Defence, Excessive Self Defence
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation