Heralding a New Dawn for Arbitration in India: Is There Reason to Be Circumspect Any More?

2013 Arbitration 79(1), 28-36

Posted: 3 Oct 2013

See all articles by Kartikey Mahajan

Kartikey Mahajan

National Law University Jodhpur (NLUJ) - Centre for Advanced Research & Training in Arbitration Law

Mallika Anand

Independent

Date Written: October 1, 2013

Abstract

In a recent case of Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium, the Indian Supreme Court has held that Part I of the Arbitration Act is not applicable to foreign seated arbitrations. Although, it is a welcome change to arbitration jurisprudence of India, however the judgment poses many concerns like the question of prospective overruling and possibility of challenging foreign awards on ground of patent illegality. This article critically examines the ruling, identifies the law laid down and explains the limits of its application.

Keywords: Arbitral proceedings, Enforcement, Foreign awards, India, International commercial arbitration, Seat of arbitration

Suggested Citation

Mahajan, Kartikey and Anand, Mallika, Heralding a New Dawn for Arbitration in India: Is There Reason to Be Circumspect Any More? (October 1, 2013). 2013 Arbitration 79(1), 28-36, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2334245

Kartikey Mahajan (Contact Author)

National Law University Jodhpur (NLUJ) - Centre for Advanced Research & Training in Arbitration Law ( email )

India

Mallika Anand

Independent ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
444
PlumX Metrics